so @leverus is full of shit about Comic-Con...

This is not nerd Woodstock. It is nerd Altamont. You will go expecting to recognize every person you see as your spiritual nerd-kin. You will leave hating your own kind.

I don't know how anyone can generalize any event of this size, but the truth is that Comic-Con isn't really Woodstock or Altamont; it's more like New York City.

There are many, MANY generalizations to be made about New York. if you want to go out and find them, you can. Someone will be rude to you. You'll find lots of garbage on the streets. You can stay up all night in the middle of Times Square.

But if you end that trip and say, "New York City is a rude, dirty city that never sleeps," full stop, does anyone really believe that mirrors any kind of reality?

The backlash that seems to be rising against Comic-Con is becoming folded into a backlash against geek culture itself, and it seems to be specifically a response to Hollywood embracing geek properties as a path toward cocaine and hookers. Their presence has turned the mainstream image of Comic-Con into a place where a lot of nerds sit in rooms and get pandered to by pretty famous people.

And that's fine. That happens. TV networks show up, small and large, and cover it. So do journalists. So do bloggers. The din is overwhelming.

But it's total bullshit to define Comic-Con as "a tumorous growth so massive that the original tissue is all but obscured." Hell, I was a couple thousand miles away, and I have a long list of projects I was excited to hear more about that have nothing to do with pretty famous people, from the next chapter in Adam Freeman and Marc Bernardin's Genius comics series to the Mickey Mouse reprints coming from Fantagraphics. I guarantee most of the stuff that is on my radar after Comic-Con isn't going to be covered by Mary Hart on Entertainment Tonight.

Does that matter? Should it? Of course not. Me and all the others who would be excited by such things got to hear more about them. On the other side of the country, some of those people even gathered in rooms to talk about them excitedly. Then they splintered off into small groups who got to commiserate, drink, and generally have fun together.

That is the spirit of Comic-Con. It's the spirit of conventions since time immemorial. It's not dead, and it won't die. And if you don't see it, or you can't find it, YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG.

(Full disclosure: I haven't been to Comic-Con since 2002. I want to go back.)

Postscript: What's becoming truly aggravating is the propensity of people who are paid to attend Comic-Con spending most of their time complaining about it on Twitter and blog posts. I get that it's exhausting, and humanity doesn't always represent itself well. But if it's that big of a burden, STAY HOME.

 

My "Guys' Guide to Comic-Con" from last year... #sdcc

Comic-Con. It’s not just for nerdy guys anymore.

That’s right-you dweebs, geeks, and weirdos who only crawl forth from your parents’ basement once a year and face the blinding light of a southern California afternoon just for the opportunity to paw Master of Kung-Fu back issues and augment your masturbatory fantasies of Eliza Dushku by sitting a few feet outside the restrictions of the restraining order while she gasses on about how happy she is to be working with Joss Whedon, even as she’s thinking, “Something smells like mildew and underwiped ass,” and she’s smelling YOU-yes, YOU-it’s not just for YOU anymore!

It’s also for scum-sucking Hollywood slime hoping to leverage your shameless enthusiasm for anything that sniffs of “geek” into cheap coverage for their vapid, horrendous projects! And for moronic “writers” who treat stereotypes as gospel in a ham-handed attempt to snort some coke off the bare ass of the zeitgeist! And supposedly, for DA LADYEZ!!! Even ones who aren’t compensating for cripplingly low self-esteem by wearing inappropriately skimpy outfits in a crowded public place!

Still pretty happy with how this turned out. I need to utilize the phrase "underwiped ass" more often.

 

[alert nerd.] Uneducated Thoughts on the 2010 WWDC Jobsnote

Part of that is because I think the reality of the front-facing camera right now and the Facetime app is nowhere near the fantasy that Apple depicts in its new commercial. Unless you and all your loved ones near and far will be there on June 24 to buy the new device, you won’t have anyone with which to schedule time to view your face. The API is open so it’s a safe bet that before the end of this year, there will be a third-party app that brings the front camera to older iPhones, or the web. Until then, your face will be lonely.

 

In "The End," How I Found Lost

The final episode of Lost was a profound experience for me.

Maybe it was for you too, or maybe it was a disappointment. Maybe you thought it was kick ass in spots, confusing in others, and were just cheering for Frank Lapidus the whole time anyway, so whatever. 

You're probably right. I don't care. Because I don't think the final outcome of Lost is really about what we can agree was cool and what wasn't, and the questions we all had in our heads and our hearts that we were hoping would be answered. In other words, if you watched that and really felt pissed that there wasn't an adequate explanation of the fertility god statue, you missed the point--or at least, I think you missed the point, but that's up to you, really. You take what you can carry. You leave behind the rest.*

The last fifteen minutes of Lost are many things, no doubt different for each of us, but one thing I think they were for me is a metaphor for how we are meant to come to terms with the show itself. For six seasons, we have watched and wondered; we have speculated and vented; we have engaged a complicated and frequently convoluted "mythology" and a rich tapestry of characters, both of which occasionally beat us about the face and head (OH JESUS NOT ANOTHER JACK EPISODE WHAT IS IT WITH THIS GUY ANYWAY). 

At the end, there aren't a full set of answers. There isn't even an acknowledgment of many of the questions. The show has dealt with what the show will deal with. It's about moving on--accepting what you've been given (or not) and waking up the next morning. Or something. You take what you can carry. You leave behind the rest. 

(The only speculation I'll offer from my personal mental wanderings is that the final scene in the church suggests that what we saw was specifically Jack's spiritual closure, and not everybody's; kind of a shame, if true, since all the characters deserve the same fulfillment. But in a sense, from our perspective, they got it; we just perceived it through Jack's experience. 

(He was always the man at the head of the action, many times placed in the leadership position of the group; he was a doctor, dedicating his life to the health of others. He had issues with his own father, true, but also needed to know that he had brought all these people he became entangled with to safety and good health, away from the island. 

(So we see somewhat incongruous things, like Sayid with Shannon instead of Nadia, or Charlie and Claire cradling Aaron; and we miss other things, like Penny and Desmond's child. Surely some of these details would be more fulfilling for those specific characters than what was shown? 

(But not to Jack. Jack fought long and hard, up to the very end, to insure the safety of the others with whom he shared the island experience. In his final moments before walking into the light, he knew everyone from that experience was okay. I presume, as long as I'm speculating, that there are similar moments, maybe in similar churches, waiting for all the island's castaways, eventually.)

At the end of the day, this series was always about the characters as well as the mythology. This last season did explore and resolve some of the mythology issues, but the amount of time devoted to this "sideways" universe made it clear that in the final summation, what would matter most for this show were the characters, and not the many, MANY bits and pieces of plot that floated around them. 

So if you didn't get the answers you wanted, so what? Did you enjoy the experience of watching the story unfold, of speculating about what may be going on with the island? Did the episodes themselves satisfy beyond the simple progress on some imagined straight path toward a never-to-come final rundown of why everything was? 

Does life work that way? Do you think you're moving through your days toward some last conclusion someplace where every event of your life will be explained and contextualized into a neat and tidy megaplot? I realize the writers have been seemingly asking us all this time to care about the island's complicated mythology, but as the show concluded, they were gently guiding us down a different path. If you choose to follow or not, that's up to you. You take what you can carry. You leave behind the rest. 

In that sense, it reminded me very much of the exceptional Sopranos finale. There was closure to be found; there were plots that ended, characters whose arcs resolved. But in the end, it was as sloppy and unexplored as life itself. What mattered was emphasized and shown; what didn't matter was ignored. That's how it goes. 

That two hours of television, for me, was this amazing spiritual thing that glistens and curves in the memory. It also had some goddamned kick ass stuff in it, like the Jack vs. Locke showdown, and Lapidus getting that plane off the ground, and Desmond uncorking the bottle. Jorge Garcia deserves an Emmy simply for his reaction to Jack dying in the cave. Terry O'Quinn needs one too. 

My friend Jeff Stolarcyk said of Lost that "any answers that we’ll accept are going to be the ones we discover for ourselves." That is the true gift of this show, and this final episode. We are being handed an opportunity to reflect upon six years of crazy and amazing storytelling, and then realize how it all came down to people helping people, and learning to move on, together. Take what you can carry. Leave behind the rest. 

This is a show that has invited us over its six seasons to bring our own questions and ideas to the table, and which at its end gives us one final idea to ponder. You can speculate, analyze, discuss; you can unpack the ways in which the eventual abandonment of the many questions within the mythology was disappointing. In the end, it wasn't about that. The Beatles had it right: "And in the end, the love you take, is equal to the love you make." 

Move on, into the light. 

* That recurring bit is a shameless swipe from a great Bruce Springsteen song, "Land of Hope and Dreams," which I think fits this final episode and its message well. It's what I want to believe about the world and life itself, neatly fit into around eight minutes and change. 

 

The End - alert nerd.

That is the final and most important reveal that the Island held in store for us, and one that the series had been preparing us for for six years – the secret of the Island is not a four-toed statue or the name of a cloud of sinister fog or who exactly fired those shots. It has never been about those things and those things are frankly inessential to any real understanding of the substance of the show, an obfuscation over its heart. The real secret of the Island has always been the characters, the survivors, the castaways.